ChartDBvswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 162 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v1.852.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 162 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.
windmill is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →windmill details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep windmill, compare it with