ChartDBvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 23 026 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
ChartDB details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with