ChartDBvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with