# ChartDB vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChartDB | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 23 028 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChartDB scores 74/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.

If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; SyncWatch同步观影 needs more configuration.

ChartDB is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChartDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chartdb-vs-syncwatch