# ChartDB vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChartDB | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

ChartDB scores 74/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChartDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chartdb-vs-scada-lts