ChartDBvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with