# ChartDB vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChartDB | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 23 026 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ChartDB scores 74/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.

If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.

ChartDB is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChartDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chartdb-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor