ChartDBvsRAWGraphs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | RAWGraphs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 7 in Data Visualization |
| GitHub stars | 23 028 | 9 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 64/100 for RAWGraphs, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RAWGraphs.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; RAWGraphs needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →RAWGraphs details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep RAWGraphs, compare it with