# ChartDB vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChartDB | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #4 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 23 028 ✓ | 9 439 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +184 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.

Pterodactyl ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.

If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

Pterodactyl is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChartDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chartdb-vs-pterodactyl