ChartDBvsOtari
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Otari | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #14 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 23 029 | 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +79 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v0.34.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.
Otari ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Otari needs more configuration.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+79 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Otari details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Otari, compare it with