ChartDBvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +454 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+454 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with