ChartDBvslila
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | lila | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #3 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 23 026 | 18 917 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
lila scores 76/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lila.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; lila needs more configuration.
lila is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →lila details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep lila, compare it with