# ChartDB vs Harbor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChartDB | Harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 29 635 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +191 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.

Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.

If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChartDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chartdb.md)
- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chartdb-vs-harbor