ChartDBvsHarbor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 29 635 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +191 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 74/100 for ChartDB, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →Harbor details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Harbor, compare it with