ChartDBvsglobalping-probe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | globalping-probe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for ChartDB.
ChartDB is growing faster right now (+77 stars in 30 days).
ChartDB details →globalping-probe details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep globalping-probe, compare it with