ChannelTubevsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChannelTube | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 333 | 17 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +978 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.9.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 47/100 for ChannelTube, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for ChannelTube.
If you want the quickest setup, ChannelTube is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+978 stars in 30 days).
ChannelTube details →Sonarr details →