# Chamilo LMS vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Chamilo LMS | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Learning Management System | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 93 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +1 264 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.11.42 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 61/100 for Chamilo LMS, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Chamilo LMS.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Chamilo LMS needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Chamilo LMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/chamilo-lms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chamilo-lms.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chamilo-lms-vs-uptime-kuma