# cftunnel vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cftunnel | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 360 | 27 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +331 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.4.4 · 26 Sept 2026 | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

WireGuard Easy scores 73/100 against 51/100 for cftunnel, so it is the safer default.

cftunnel ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.

WireGuard Easy is growing faster right now (+331 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cftunnel](https://selfhost.directory/project/cftunnel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cftunnel.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cftunnel-vs-wireguard-easy