# cftunnel vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted [Network projects](https://selfhost.directory/network), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | cftunnel | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 360 | 5 913 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +119 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 40 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.4 · 26 Sept 2026 | v0.19.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

scanopy scores 64/100 against 51/100 for cftunnel, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 40 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for cftunnel.

scanopy is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [cftunnel](https://selfhost.directory/project/cftunnel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cftunnel.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cftunnel-vs-scanopy