# ceph vs Zealot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Zealot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 ✓ | 1 368 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.

Zealot ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, Zealot is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Zealot](https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-zealot