# ceph vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 17 180 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

url-to-png ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-url-to-png