# ceph vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 | 39 754 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +773 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 78/100 for ceph, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+773 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-umami