# ceph vs Ticky

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Ticky |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #14 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 180 ✓ | 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.15.2 · 2 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 50/100 for Ticky, so it is the safer default.

Ticky ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, Ticky is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Ticky](https://selfhost.directory/project/ticky) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ticky.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-ticky