# ceph vs Tdarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Tdarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 ✓ | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 ✓ | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | Makefile |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-tdarr