# ceph vs Tamari

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Tamari |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 ✓ | 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.1 · 14 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 46/100 for Tamari, so it is the safer default.

Tamari ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, Tamari is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Tamari](https://selfhost.directory/project/tamari) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tamari.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-tamari