# ceph vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 180 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana