# ceph vs OxMgr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | OxMgr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #6 of 20 in Application Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 ✓ | 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 49/100 for OxMgr, so it is the safer default.

OxMgr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, OxMgr is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [OxMgr](https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oxmgr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-oxmgr