# ceph vs OSEM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | OSEM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #8 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 ✓ | 929 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

ceph is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-osem