# ceph vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 17 180 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-octobot