# ceph vs nati.ve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | nati.ve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #21 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 177 ✓ | 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 48/100 for nati.ve, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, nati.ve is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [nati.ve](https://selfhost.directory/project/native) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/native.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-native