# ceph vs mkcertWeb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | mkcertWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 179 ✓ | 221 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.

mkcertWeb ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, mkcertWeb is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

ceph is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [mkcertWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-mkcertweb