# ceph vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 180 | 46 471 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +1 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 78/100 for ceph, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-mitmproxy