# ceph vs ADAMANT IPFS Node

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | ADAMANT IPFS Node |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 ✓ | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

ADAMANT IPFS Node ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

ceph is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-ipfs-node