# ceph vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 ✓ | 5 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +223 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ceph scores 78/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-hiclaw