# ceph vs headscale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ceph | headscale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 | 45 162 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +1 055 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

headscale scores 82/100 against 78/100 for ceph, so it is the safer default.

headscale ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.

If you want the quickest setup, headscale is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.

headscale is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ceph](https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ceph.md)
- [headscale](https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/headscale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ceph-vs-headscale