# CELERITY-panel vs docker-pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CELERITY-panel | docker-pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 219 | 11 728 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +113 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.6.19 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 49/100 for CELERITY-panel, so it is the safer default.

CELERITY-panel ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; CELERITY-panel needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CELERITY-panel](https://selfhost.directory/project/celerity-panel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/celerity-panel.md)
- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/celerity-panel-vs-docker-pi-hole