CELERITY-panelvsdocker-pi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CELERITY-panel | docker-pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 219 | 11 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.6.19 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 49/100 for CELERITY-panel, so it is the safer default.
CELERITY-panel ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; CELERITY-panel needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
CELERITY-panel details →docker-pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep CELERITY-panel, compare it with
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with