CDRM-Project-2.0vsTransmission
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CDRM-Project-2.0 | Transmission | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Media | #2 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 15 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | 4.1.4 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Transmission scores 76/100 against 38/100 for CDRM-Project-2.0, so it is the safer default.
Transmission ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CDRM-Project-2.0.
If you want the quickest setup, Transmission is easier to run; CDRM-Project-2.0 needs more configuration.
Transmission is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).
CDRM-Project-2.0 details →Transmission details →
Swap a project
Keep CDRM-Project-2.0, compare it with
Keep Transmission, compare it with