# CatGPT-Gateway vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted [AI projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CatGPT-Gateway | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #64 of 125 in AI | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 314 | 393 292 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 944 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for CatGPT-Gateway, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CatGPT-Gateway.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; CatGPT-Gateway needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CatGPT-Gateway](https://selfhost.directory/project/catgpt-gateway) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/catgpt-gateway.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/catgpt-gateway-vs-openclaw