CatGPT-Gatewayvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted AI projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CatGPT-Gateway | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #64 of 125 in AI | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 314 | 393 292 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 944 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for CatGPT-Gateway, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CatGPT-Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; CatGPT-Gateway needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).
CatGPT-Gateway details →openclaw details →All AI projects →
Swap a project
Keep CatGPT-Gateway, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with