# CasaOS vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | CasaOS | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in Home Server | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 37 393 ✓ | 1 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

CasaOS scores 76/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for CasaOS.

If you want the quickest setup, CasaOS is easier to run; tapflow needs more configuration.

CasaOS is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [CasaOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/casaos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/casaos.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/casaos-vs-tapflow