# capjs vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | capjs | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 78 in Security | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 8 203 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +351 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | standalone@3.1.13 · 23 Sept 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

capjs scores 72/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

capjs ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, capjs is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

capjs is growing faster right now (+351 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [capjs](https://selfhost.directory/project/capjs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/capjs.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/capjs-vs-uusec-waf