# camofox-browser vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 12 039 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +282 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+282 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-zero-k