# camofox-browser vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 030 | 16 061 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap