# camofox-browser vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 12 037 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +280 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+280 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-wps-office