# camofox-browser vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 12 035 ✓ | 8 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +278 ✓ | +160 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-woodpecker-ci