# camofox-browser vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 12 027 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-windows-arm