# camofox-browser vs windmill

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 | 18 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 163 ✓ |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.853.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

windmill scores 77/100 against 75/100 for camofox-browser, so it is the safer default.

windmill ships more often: 163 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for camofox-browser.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [windmill](https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-windmill