# camofox-browser vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 ✓ | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-whisperlive-cpu