# camofox-browser vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | camofox-browser | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Browser Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 12 031 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | camoufox-backup-404310733 · 7 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

camofox-browser scores 75/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

camofox-browser ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, camofox-browser is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

camofox-browser is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [camofox-browser](https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/camofox-browser.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/camofox-browser-vs-uusec-waf